Literaturdatenbank
Literaturdatenbank |
|
 |
|
Ceballos, C. P., & Valenzuela, N. (2011). The role of sex-specific plasticity in shaping sexual dimorphism in a long-lived vertebrate, the snapping turtle chelydra serpentina. Evolutionary Biology, 38, 163–181.
Added by: Sarina Wunderlich (25 Jun 2011 12:41:22 UTC) |
| Resource type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/s11692-011-9117-8 BibTeX citation key: Ceballos2011 View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: General Keywords: Chelydra, Chelydra serpentina, Chelydridae, Schildkröten = turtles + tortoises, Zeitigung = incubation Creators: Ceballos, Valenzuela Collection: Evolutionary Biology |
Views: 5/628
Views index: 13% Popularity index: 3.25% |
| Abstract |
|
Sex-specific plasticity, the differential response that the genome of males and females may have to different environments, is a mechanism that can affect the degree of sexual dimorphism. Two adaptive hypotheses have been proposed to explain how sex-specific plasticity affects the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. The adaptive canalization hypothesis states that the larger sex exhibits lesser plasticity compared to the smaller sex due to strong directional selection for a large body size, which penalizes individuals attaining sub-optimal body sizes. The condition-dependence hypothesis states that the larger sex exhibits greater plasticity than the smaller sex due to strong directional selection for a large body size favoring a greater sensitivity as an opportunistic mechanism for growth enhancement under favorable conditions. While the relationship between sex-specific plasticity and sexual dimorphism has been studied mainly in invertebrates, its role in long-lived vertebrates has received little attention. In this study we tested the predictions derived from these two hypotheses by comparing the plastic responses of body size and shape of males and females of the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) raised under common garden conditions. Body size was plastic, sexually dimorphic, and the plasticity was also sex-specific, with males exhibiting greater body size plasticity relative to females. Because snapping turtle males are larger than females, sexual size dimorphism in this species appears to be driven by an increased plasticity of the larger sex over the smaller sex as predicted by the condition-dependent hypothesis. However, male body size was enhanced under relatively limited resources, in contrast to expectations from this model. Body shape was also plastic and sexually dimorphic, however no sex by environment interaction was found in this case. Instead, plasticity of sexual shape dimorphism seems to evolve in parallel for males and females as both sexes responded similarly to different environments.
Added by: Sarina Wunderlich |