Literaturdatenbank
Literaturdatenbank |
|
 |
|
Lovich, J. E., & Ennen, J. R. (2013). A quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge of turtles of the united states and canada. Amphibia-Reptilia, (advance article).
Added by: Admin (06 Jan 2014 18:22:58 UTC) |
| Resource type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/15685381-00002860 BibTeX citation key: Lovich2013a View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: General Keywords: Emydidae, Graptemys oculifera, Habitat - habitat, Kinosternidae, Nordamerika - North America, Pseudemys alabamensis, Schildkröten - turtles + tortoises, Sternotherus depressus Creators: Ennen, Lovich Collection: Amphibia-Reptilia |
Views: 5/836
Views index: 17% Popularity index: 4.25% |
| Abstract |
|
The “information age” ushered in an explosion of knowledge and access to knowledge that continues to revolutionize society. Knowledge about turtles, as measured by number of published papers, has been growing at an exponential rate since the early 1970s, a phenomenon mirrored in all scientific disciplines. Although knowledge about turtles, as measured by number of citations for papers in scientific journals, has been growing rapidly, this taxonomic group remains highly imperiled suggesting that knowledge is not always successfully translated into effective conservation of turtles. We reviewed the body of literature on turtles of the United States and Canada and found that: 1) the number of citations is biased toward large-bodied species, 2) the number of citations is biased toward wide-ranging species, and 3) conservation status has little effect on the accumulation of knowledge for a species, especially after removing the effects of body size or range size. The dispersion of knowledge, measured by Shannon Weiner diversity and evenness indices across species, was identical from 1994 to 2009 suggesting that poorly studied species remained poorly-studied species while well-studied species remained well studied. Several species listed as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (e.g., Pseudemys alabamensis, Sternotherus depressus, and Graptemys oculifera) remain poorly studied with the estimated number of citations for each ranging from only 13-24. The low number of citations for these species could best be explained by their restricted distribution and/or their smaller size. Despite the exponential increase in knowledge of turtles in the United States and Canada, no species of turtle listed under the Endangered Species Act has ever been delisted for reason of recovery. Therefore, increased knowledge does not necessarily contribute appreciably to recovery of threatened turtles.
Added by: Admin |